A Philosopher's Blog

The Koch Brothers’ War on Education

Posted in Business, Ethics, Politics by Michael LaBossiere on March 5, 2011
Title page to Locke's Some Thoughts Concerning...

Image via Wikipedia

The Koch brothers are certainly skilled strategists and tacticians in the political game. One of their standard tactics has been the creation of front groups that work to push their agenda and attack those who oppose their goals. These groups tend to have positive sounding names like “Americans for Prosperity” and also tend to try to create the illusion that they are the natural product of grass root movements and popular support.

While it makes sense for the Koch brothers to target those trying to protect workers or the environment (or, as they probably see it, people who are a threat to their bottom line) it might seem odd for them to set their front groups against teachers. This attack has also been taken up by the fine folks at Fox (who, some might say, are fine corporate sock puppets).

One of the main focuses of the attacks has been to try to assert that the teachers in Wisconsin are paid far better than the average worker. For example, Eric Bolling claimed that Wisconsin teachers received $51,000 in salary and $38,000 in benefits. In contrast, he asserted that the average private sector worker is paid $38,000 in wages and gets $10,000 in benefits. Presumably this comparison was intended to enrage workers against the “high paid” teachers who are presumably growing fat on tax dollars.

However, Bolling made a few mistakes. First, he seems to have overestimated the benefits. The median for benefits is $25,800, which is quite a bit less than the claimed $39,000. However, this is still $76,000 which is obviously more than the $48,000 alleged by Bolling. This leads to his second error. The average private sector worker has a salary of $46,000 and $20,000 in benefits, which narrows the gap considerably. His third error is the comparison that he made. He compared teachers with all private sector workers regardless of education. An accurate comparison would require comparing private sector workers with comparable college degrees to teachers. Interestingly, the average starting salary for college graduates in 2011 will be $50,034. When benefits are taken into consideration, it would seem that the average teacher compensation in Wisconsin is on par with the starting compensation for college graduates. As such, Bolling’s criticism is rather lacking in bite.

This is not to say that there are not legitimate problems in education that need to be be addressed. However, excessive teacher pay is clearly not one of them.

If the attacks on education were consistently aimed at real problems (such as the low performance of students or the educational disparities along economic lines) or they contributed to education in a significant way, then it could be argued that the Koch brothers and their allies were genuinely concerned about improving America’s education system. However, this is clearly not the case. This leads to the question of their actual goals and motivations.

One main motivation seems to be the elimination of the teachers’ union. Teacher’s unions tend to consistently support Democrats rather than Republicans, mainly because Democrats tend to be more pro-education and less inclined to be creationists. Breaking the teachers’ union would thus remove a source of support for Democrats and thus increase the chances of Republicans being elected. While Democrats tend to give corporations almost everything they want, Republicans generally give them everything they want. Hence the preference for Republicans. Naturally, it seems rather wicked and selfish to launch an assault on the education system as a move in a political game.

A second main motivation seems to be the desire to make the education system more vulnerable to manipulation. For example, the Koch brothers have endeavored, via their well paid front groups, to convince people that climate change is a myth. No doubt they would prefer to see their view being taught in the schools and it would be much easier to make this so without organized opposition from the teachers union.

To anticipate the obvious rejoinder that there are problems in education and that the teachers’ unions have problems as well, I say that I agree there are problems. However, eliminating the teachers’ unions is not the solution to these problems anymore than eliminating corporations is the solution to the problems that corporations cause.

Enhanced by Zemanta

13 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. T. J. Babson said, on March 5, 2011 at 1:04 pm

    Not so fast, Mike. Make sure your facts present the full picture.

    Let’s not forget that the evil Koch brothers gave $20M to the ACLU to defeat parts of the Patriot act:

    He and his brother Charles, along with George Soros, the Ford Foundation and the Rockefeller Foundation each contributed $10 million to the ACLU to defeat parts of the USA Patriot Act.

    http://www.lasocialdiary.com/node/125921

    ***************************************************
    The Koch’s have also donated hugely to education and the arts:

    Since 2000, Koch has pledged and/or donated more than $600 million to the arts, education and medical research, more than he gave to political causes.[18]

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_H._Koch#Philanthropy

    *******************************************************
    Also see:

    http://www.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/frrth/stop_the_koch_brothers_they_are_trying_to_end_the/

    The KOCH brothers must be stopped. They gave $40K to Scott Walker, the MAX allowed by state law. That’s small potatoes compared to the $100+ million they give to other organizations. These organizations will terrify you. If the anti-union thing weren’t enough, here are bigger and better reasons to stop the evil Kochs. They are trying to:

    1. decriminalize drugs,
    2. legalize gay marriage,
    3. repeal the Patriot Act,
    4. end the police state,
    5. cut defense spending.

    Who hates the police? Only the criminals using drugs, amirite? We need the Patriot Act to allow government to go through our emails and tap our phones to catch people who smoke marijuana and put them in prison. Oh, it’s also good for terrorists.

    Wikipedia shows Koch Family Foundations supporting causes like:

    1. CATO Institute
    2. Reason Foundation
    3. cancer research ($150 million to M.I.T. – STOP THEM! KEEP CANCER ALIVE!)
    4. ballet (because seriously: FUCK. THAT. SHIT.)

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Koch_Family_Foundations

    The Kochs basically give a TON of money (millions of dollars) to the CATO Institute. Scott Walker, $40K? HAH! These CATO people are the REAL problem. They want to end the War on Drugs. Insane, right? We know that the War on Drugs keeps us SAFE from Mexicans and keeps all that violence on their side of the fence. More than 30,000 Mexicans killed as of December! Thank God Mexican lives don’t count as human lives. Our government is doing a good, no, a great job protecting us and seriously, who cares about brown people or should I say non-people? HAHAHA! Public unions are good, government is good, and government protects us from drugs and brown people. The Kochs want to end all that. Look, as far back as 1989 CATO has been trying to decriminalize drugs. Don’t worry, nobody listens to them because they are INSANE.

    http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=981

    CATO also rejects the Patriot Act. How can you hate the Patriot Act? Are you not American? They made it easy for you to understand by putting the word “Patriot” in the legislation. That means you should vote YES. Giving up our civil liberties is not a big deal. We need our government. Whether it’s Obama or Bush, we can all agree that the TSA is really good at what they do. God, those patdowns feel SOOOO good.

    http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=10599

    The Kochs also support Reason Foundation. You don’t know about that? Let me tell you. Basically, REASON Foundation is a bunch of cop haters. Last month, they did a “news” (as if we wanna know!) story on three cops that beat up an unarmed black kid. In the aftermath, the cops were suspended, sat around doing nothing and got paid (like that’s a bad thing!). I don’t know about you, but that puts a smile on my face for four reasons:

    1. I hate black people,
    2. I love the police,
    3. I love it when police beat up black people for no reason,
    4. I love that it comes out of taxpayers’ money, because it’s not like it’s really my money.

    The Kochs are trying to end this. The Kochs must be stopped.

    http://reason.com/archives/2011/01/24/a-beating-in-pittsburgh

    CATO trying to cut defense spending:

    http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/how-to-cut-military-spending/

    Gay marriage. YUCK. That’s just obvious. If the KOCH Brothers have their way, there will be homos getting married left and right. Here’s another scary thought: gays raising children.

    http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=6379

    Here are some videos from Glenn Greenwald, one of those “gays.” He writes for the liberal Salon.com, but don’t let that fool you. He’s in the Koch Brothers’ pocket. Here are some videos to prove my point:

    Here’s Glenn Greenwald talking about drug-decriminalization at REASON:

    Yeah, he’s that Glenn Greenwald that also defends WikiLeaks.

    If there’s one thing I know about billionaires, it’s that they only care about money. Bill Gates, Warren Buffett and George Soros. They aren’t fooling me. Bill Gates isn’t fooling me with his vaccination campaign in Africa. He’s just trying to make African children live longer so they will buy more copies of Windows. Wow. Not even trying to hide it.

    Now, I don’t know why the KOCH brothers want gay people to have the right to marry. Everybody knows marriage is for a man and a woman. Even Obama believes that. Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve amirite? I haven’t figured out the angle, yet. Maybe it’s like this:

    1. legalize drugs
    2. legalize gay marriage
    3. sell drugs, oil and Koch napkins to gays at their weddings
    4. ????
    5. PROFIT$

    I don’t know exactly how it would work, but we can all agree that they’re evil. Think about it. CATO and REASON are the only institutions OPENLY advocating these positions. Who would do such a thing? Have they no shame? Minority opinions MUST BE SILENCED.

    Anyway, we must reject everything that the KOCH brothers do in Wisconsin and around the country. We will succeed as long as we stick to the GROUP-&-THINK.

    YES WE CAN. The truth is always simple. You’re either with us or against us.
    twitter @epistemicfail

    Stop the Koch menace.

  2. FRE said, on March 5, 2011 at 3:23 pm

    Recently I saw information that showed that in the five states with the poorest education systems and low per capita incomes, the teachers were not unionized whereas in most states with good education systems and high per capita incomes, the teachers were unionized. Of course the fact that two things are correlated does not prove that one causes the other, but it would seem to indicate that teachers’ unions are not necessarily bad and may actually be beneficial.

    There does seem to be a correlation between tax rates and per capita income. Those states with the highest income and property taxes generally have a much higher per capita income than those states with the lowest income and property taxes which would seem to indicate that people in high tax states are getting something for their money.

    Perhaps someone would like to research these relationships more thoroughly and post the information.

    • Michael LaBossiere said, on March 5, 2011 at 4:16 pm

      Finland, which does extremely well in the education sphere, is apparently all union. This does not, of course, entail that unions cause an improvement in education. However, it does show that teachers’ unions are compatible with top notch academic performance. Naturally, there are other factors that need to be assessed, but this is an interesting bit of data.

      Finland also does not use the standardized testing that American education is being pushed into (mostly, as far as I can tell, so well connected testing companies can sell their products).

      • FRE said, on March 5, 2011 at 5:04 pm

        I became aware of the dangers of standardized tests when I lived in Fiji (1994 – 2004). In Fiji, students are, at several points in their schooling, given external examinations. The students have to pass them to move to the next grade or receive a high school diploma. Also, the schools and teachers are rated by the percentage of students who pass. The result is that many teachers will not teach anything that is not in the external examinations. This does produce results which seem to be positive, but there is a serious downside.

        A boy who had just finished the fourth grade migrated with his family from Fiji to California and, by taking a placement test, was able to skip the fifth grade and go the the sixth grade. I was very impressed until I learned more.

        When high school graduates from Fiji go to a tertiary school in another country, they really have to struggle. Because there is too much rote learning in Fiji and because students are not taught to think critically for themselves, evaluate, and analyze, they are lost when they go to tertiary schools in other countries. Many survive, but only after a long struggle. The problem is recognized, but insufficient corrective action has been taken. When new mathematics tests were introduced which included story problems, students had trouble with them and complained that there were too many words.

        For many years, students in Fiji learned their examination results from the newspaper; the results were published with their real names. After many years, that was finally stopped because of belated concern with the resulting suicides.

        Standardized tests probably have their place; they can evaluate quite well the ability to solve mathematical equations and regurgitate memorized facts, but that’s about all they can do. So, relying excessively on standardized tests would not be a reasonable thing to do.

        My impression is that some teachers’ unions are basically constructive and do all they can to ensure that students have an opportunity to receive a good education, but that some teachers’ unions are obstructionists and their main function is to provide job security for teachers, including poor teachers. One of the problems with politicians is that they tend to generalize instead of distinguishing good unions from bad unions.

        • Anonymous said, on March 5, 2011 at 6:41 pm

          Don’t underestimate the “job security for teachers” issue. In the pre-teacher’s-union-and-collective-bargaining era, teacher security was merely a subject for discussion, not a reality. Nepotism was all too common. Take away the unions and their power to negotiate, and the days of school board members miraculously “discovering” open teaching positions for their nieces or grandchildren who are exiting college with teaching certification would likely return.

          I’m not certain I’ve yet heard of an honest, effective, and precise process for teacher evaluation. I’m certain I’ve heard many statements about “what makes a good teacher” that are based on misguided, subjective conclusions, and very few that are based on real, honest to God, ideology-free research. Discover and develop a good evaluation process, and I’m willing to bet teacher’s unions will accept it. Why wouldn’t they? Their opponents have been (effectively but dishonestly) using the issue to thump them for years.

          • FRE said, on March 5, 2011 at 7:15 pm

            I think that I haven’t underestimated the “job security for teachers” issue; after all, I wrote, “My impression is that some teachers’ unions are basically constructive and do all they can to ensure that students have an opportunity to receive a good education, but that some teachers’ unions are obstructionists and their main function is to provide job security for teachers, including poor teachers.”

            Although fairly evaluating teachers may not be easy, from what I’ve read, they’ve done it fairly well in Norway.

            Poor results are often blamed on the neighborhood and parents, and not without good reason. However, it appears that unusually excellent schools and teachers are able to overcome the disadvantages caused by poor neighborhoods and parents and achieve good results.

            • Anonymous said, on March 5, 2011 at 7:24 pm

              Have we brought the Norwegian approach over here and researched its effects in “our” school systems? What were the results?

            • Anonymous said, on March 5, 2011 at 8:31 pm

              This piece is a bit old, but I doubt that, given the direction the US seems to have taken over the last 10-20 years, the general differences have changed significantly.

              http://www.huppi.com/kangaroo/8Comparison.htm

              If these figures are anywhere near accurate there are multiple reasons to assume that the societies are significantly different enough to make attempts to compare what works in the Norwegian school system and what would work in American schools at least somewhat dubious and at most nearly useless. The differences in violent deaths, and crime in general, and poverty alone indicate that the child who enters the school system in Norway and the one who enters kindergarten in the US might, just might, be significantly different and pose significantly differently challenges to the teacher and the teaching process.

              Norway is a ” parliamentary representative democratic constitutional monarchy” while ours is a constitutional republic based on a representative democracy. So our governmental structures share a few words. How the operate in terms of running their educational system . It would be interesting to know what role local areas play in the administration of their local schools? Do they have a few counties with no smaller districts. Many counties with many districts as we do? How would this affect the teaching process and the way the evaluation process is administered?

    • Michael LaBossiere said, on March 5, 2011 at 4:26 pm

      High incomes would enable higher taxes to be supported. However, it is well worth considering that the higher taxes can be spent in ways that actually improve income: better education, better infrastructure, more support for local business, better services (fire, police, etc.).

      Unions could also benefit the quality of education by protecting teachers from political whims. They would also tend to enable teachers to get more resources for the schools, which could increase the quality of education. Interestingly enough, most teachers are very concerned about the quality of education (and not with those fat education salaries) and strong unions tend to work towards those goals.

  3. umesh bawa said, on March 5, 2011 at 6:31 pm

    cato’s letters were published to save entire liberty of nation….
    Plz. Bring something unsual…

  4. WTP said, on March 5, 2011 at 7:20 pm

    For more guilt by association see…

    http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20110305/ap_on_en_ot/us_wisconsin_budget_unions_protest

  5. WTP said, on March 11, 2014 at 9:50 am

    Koch Derangement Syndrome strikes again:

    The Koch brothers are at it again. Their right-wing political Panzer Division descended on a New York City hospital over the weekend to protest (!) the addition of a new ambulatory care center. What the hell, Koch bros? Why not pro-America?

    Sorry. That’s not quite right. In fact, it was the New York State Nurses’ Association, the NAACP New York State Conference, and SEIU Local 1199, among others, who marched on the soon-to-be-built David H. Koch Center at New York-Presbyterian Hospital, which was funded in part by a $100 million donation from the man one prominent liberal recently predicted would go down in history as a “famously evil person.”

    http://freebeacon.com/blog/koch-brother-donates-money-to-hospital-liberals-protest-not-a-parody/


Leave a comment