A Philosopher's Blog

Text Books

Posted in Universities & Colleges by Michael LaBossiere on August 22, 2011
The Text Book of Weightlifting

Image via Wikipedia

While the Fall 2011 semester does not get started until next week, I have been dutifully preparing my classes since my contract kicked in (August 8). As happens every two years, the text book I use for my Critical Inquiry class has been updated to a new edition. While new editions of text books are sometimes created for good reasons (new material, improvements, and so on) it is common for books to be “updated” just to make past editions obsolete. For example, I used a text book that “updated” by changing the cover color and removing a few of the readings I actually used. I stopped using that book and switched to creating my own custom reader.

Since publishers are in the business of making money, this practice makes sense. After all, if the books were updated only when an update was actually needed, then the folks making the money would be those selling and reselling the old books over and over again. In contrast, the publishers (and authors) would be out of the loop after the initial sale. By updating books on a regular basis the publishers are able to stay in the money chain. Being a writer myself, I understand this. However, I also expect that the update be a real update as well-I am not going to make my students go with a new edition just because it has a new cover and fewer readings. Honesty also forces me to note that I would rather not update my own class material unless there is a good reason to do so. I do not consider helping a publisher make money a good enough reason.

Another point of concern about text books is their cost. The paperback book I use for my Critical Inquiry class sells for $91.35 on Amazon. It is color and has 546 pages. By way of comparison, the Pathfinder Core Rulebook is hardcover, 30 pages longer and sells for $60 less on Amazon. I do find it increasingly hard to justify the cost of a textbook. After all, companies like Lulu can print books for very little and then there is the matter of ebooks which have incredibly low distribution costs.

When students do ask me about the cost, I am honest and say that the prices certainly seem needlessly high. I do, however, note that the process of creating a professional text book can be expensive. Such books are written by professionals and must be evaluated by other professionals before they are published. As such, part of the cost of a book is ensuring that it is a proper textbook and not junk (although there is plenty of junk out there). While cranking out fiction is challenging, producing a good textbook is a great deal of work. After all, one cannot just make stuff up (even in philosophy). As such, the difference in content can also be seen as justifying the pricing distinction between a paperback copy of Harry Potter and a physics text.

There is also the fact that some text books come with considerable online additions. For example, the text I use for Critical Inquiry includes an extensive array of online material such as interactive exercises and other educational goodies. Taken as an entire package, the price is reasonable. Almost.

There is also the matter of market size. While a popular paperback will sell a large number of copies, text books are generally not best sellers. After all, they are aimed at a small population (college students) that is made even smaller by the fact that books are field and even class specific. Also, there are many different books on each subject which means that a critical thinking text might only be used by a few professors at a few universities. To make a profit, the cost per unit must be fairly high. Of course, telling students that the publishers have to charge a lot because they cannot sell enough books to charge less does not really go over well.

One impact of the cost is, of course, that students usually try to avoid buying the book. I am, as all professors are, asked if the book is necessary for the course (weirdly enough people still ask me this when the book is a free download). Presumably the publishers have estimated how much they would make if they lowered prices to encourage purchasing. Perhaps they have found that a lower price would not result in an increase in revenue.

Because of the book problem, I use public domain works in most of my classes and make them available as a PDF “course pack.” Fortunately most of the best material in philosophy is in the public domain. Other subjects do not have this as a viable option. For example, learning engineering from books that have gone into the public domain due to time is probably not the best idea (although there are no doubt some very good old books on the fundamentals).

Yes, you do need the book.



Enhanced by Zemanta

3 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. James Claims said, on August 22, 2011 at 10:38 am

    As a student for several years, I’ve noticed a marked difference between the cost of courses at the undergrad level and at the graduate level. At the undergrad level, most of the lower classes thankfully used more enlightenment materials (and I won’t dump on reading hume again any day). So the classes were relatively cheap. It was the course reader textbooks that always got me in terms of price. Yet, at the graduate level, I’ve yet to buy anything for classes for two years now. We’re given articles from jstor and no purchase necessary since our library system gives us access. Granted, at this level, the technical nature of most of the articles is no longer a barrier to reading them, but it still is an interesting difference that I’ve noticed between graduate and undergraduate levels. However, I have had to buy some of my own copies of books for research since I have to tango with other graduate students all hunting for the same materials. Still, one can pick up many of the books used for $20 or so, unless it’s been published in the past 5 years.

    It’s just an observation I’ve made over the past few years, that as one leans more and more on the library for resources, the classes can drastically be reduced in price for reading.

  2. FRE said, on August 22, 2011 at 1:23 pm

    Some text book writers write as though they are being paid by the word rather than by meaningful content. That was certainly true of some economics text books that I was assigned when I was working on my degree.

    I especially remember one particular case. I re-read a page several times and still had the feeling that I had got little or nothing out of it. I ended up outlining the page then realized that, although it was full of words, the content was little greater than zero; the author could have covered the actual content in only a couple sentences.
    So sometimes students have to waste their time sifting through verbiage with little or no actual content just so the author can make more money. That can be a serious problem for students who are pressed for time (and money).

    Your comments on new editions are certainly true. It would help if instructors gave students a choice of editions and, in the course syllabus, included page numbers for two or three editions of the text book. That wouldn’t be especially difficult since among editions, the page numbers generally don’t greatly differ so it would take little time to locate the equivalent page numbers.

  3. Asur said, on August 22, 2011 at 2:28 pm

    After all, one cannot just make stuff up (even in philosophy).

    Caveat: in philosophy, it no longer counts as having made stuff up after people cite you a few times.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: