A Philosopher's Blog

A New Monopoly

Posted in Technology, Video Games by Michael LaBossiere on February 20, 2011
Monopoly Justice

Image by mtsofan via Flickr

Like most people, I have many fond (and some repressed) memories of playing Monopoly. I always tried to be the battleship, because, well, it had guns. I generally lost, but this was obviously an omen that I was intended for something other than a life of commerce.

While much of my gaming today is computer or console based (I even have a copy of Monopoly for the Xbox 360 in my house), I still have a boxed set of the classic game in my closet, along with my copy of Axis & Allies, Clue and other such games. After all, there is a lot to be said for gathering around a table with friends, snacks and some dice.

I had heard that Hasbro was updating Monopoly for the video game age, but did not think much about it until I saw a video of the new game. It struck me as some sort of horrible science fiction scenario: the beloved land of Monopoly had apparently been conquered and the black and red tower of the new master surveys the vanquished land.

This new monarch purports to be a benign overlord: it replaces the dice, money and rules of the game, thus freeing the players of the strain of rolling dice and the burden of basic math. Players play at its behest and obey its commands (or, presumably, Daleks are summoned to exterminate the transgressors).

The folks at Hasbro see this as bring a video game like experience to the game. However, I think they are fundamentally misguided.

First, as I mentioned above, there already is a Monopoly video game. So, people who want to play Monopoly as a video game can do that. There seems to be no real need to make a board game that tries to be a video game as well.

Second, the board game experience is fundamentally different from the video game experience and this difference provides something valuable. In video games, you are at the mercy of the rules set in the game (aside from using mods or hacking). With a board game, part of the game is agreeing on and applying the rules as a social group rather than having the rules inflicted by a small plastic tower. True, players sometimes try to be little dictators about the rules-but those are the game sessions that tend to really suck. As such, the new game seems to capture one of the worst aspects of live games while not providing the compensation that good video games provide in return for their lordship over the rules, such as impressive graphics. Thus, the democracy of the live game is replaced by the tyranny of the computer, without any of the awesomeness of actual video games.

Third, that tower set up looks stupid. Vaguely menacing, too. Red and black? Seriously?

Enhanced by Zemanta
About these ads

2 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. - Sue Barnett, BA English said, on February 20, 2011 at 8:34 am

    Lol, red and black! I never noticed it so much until I put a red and black curtain up at my window. In the curtain material shop it was one of the only materials that wasn’t seethrough, and I thought it was nice and bold and dramatic, for people who wanted to see it that way, and also served to tell the aggressive and violent but anonymous men who shouted and threw things at my window at around midnight that they could take a hike, to put it politely. I’m sure you are aware I could put it far less politely. The suddenly it was all over the place – I noticed it with the Labour Party logo, it was suddenly there on System Mechanic as advertised by my aol client. I can’t remember where else I saw it. I suppose it doesn’t really work with my little red brick house though. It just makes it look delapidated, which it is anyway. Lovely, airy inside, spacious – but definitely needs so much work! It’s rented though. I thought I could tolerate it for a short period, maybe even up to two years, and I’d be able to save to buy. That was the idea. So sad it went wrong. So sad I am too inadequate and uncommitted and shallow to make it work and find the resources in myself to recover damaged relationships. I’m fully aware it is all my fault if I don’t manage to keep such a gorgeous little house in such a lovely environment, in spite of the aggro, for another year. I mean it. The place is gorgeous, and I’m really upset and heartbroken and I feel really inadequate and guilty and scummy and it’s all my fault, because I know people would be amenable if I gave them another chance and hoped for one myself. After all, that’s what people are like, so everyone tells me.

    I haven’t logged into this email account for a while, so I haven’t seen the notifications for your blog.

  2. Asur said, on February 20, 2011 at 4:17 pm

    Here’s a link that has a picture of it and a demo video of game play:

    http://news.cnet.com/8301-17938_105-20033996-1.html

    I have to agree that it looks pretty ridiculous and sorta ominous. It’s the sort of think that, in real life, I would expect to be carved out of basalt and engraved with “Obey” or “Order, at any cost.”


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 2,087 other followers

%d bloggers like this: