A Philosopher's Blog

Remaking Movies

Posted in Aesthetics by Michael LaBossiere on June 18, 2010
Karate kid
Image via Wikipedia

Hollywood has an established history for remaking movies, despite the fact that these remakes usually turn out badly. However, the do seem to make enough money so that Hollywood folks keep cranking them out.

One of the most recent remakes is the Karate Kid. As some critics have pointed out, the kid is not learning karate but rather kung fu. It is not entirely clear why a movie with “karate” in the title would actually be about kung fu, but perhaps the folks in Hollywood are unaware of the distinction between the two. Of course, they could have made a movie called the Kung Fu Kid but presumably they are hoping to cash in on the nostalgia for the original movie by using the same name.

In some cases a remake might make sense. One legitimate reason might be to take advantage of advances in special effects, provided that these advances would improve on the original. A second legitimate reason could be to remake a film whose setting is dated yet is worth remaking in a contemporary context. The works of Shakespeare are often set in different times with great (or modest) success. The same could be true of some movies. Perhaps the Karate Kid is such a movie. If so, that is good.

Of course, the two main reasons that movies are remade tend to be 1) Hollywood is out of new ideas and 2) a desire to make money. A film that worked once can be expected to have a chance of working again (although, ironically, remakes often are worse than the originals). More importantly, people tend to not be inclined to pay to see an old movie re-released in the theaters. However, people are more inclined to pay to see a remake.

I did see the original Karate Kid and thought it was okay. I never wanted to see it again, so I won’t see the remake.

Another remake (or sorts) is the film version of Avatar, the Last Airbender. This was originally a three season animated series on Nickelodeon. While it was aimed primarily at kids, it actually had well-developed characters, an interesting mythology, an original setting, and a well-written storyline. I recently re-watched the series on Netflix and rather enjoyed it.

I suspect the Avatar movie might be rather bad. First, the story has already been told over three seasons. Usually a movie that tries to condense a long story into a single film tends to end up a poor work. Second, the director has had a track record of rather weak films lately. While he did some good films, he has really been in a slump lately. Perhaps he got his game back for this film, but perhaps not. Third, transforming an animated series into live action generally does not go well. Fourth, the commercials seemed a bit…cheesy. While I try to avoid judging a film on the commercial, what I saw made me think of various bad fantasy films I’ve seen over the years. Finally, the studio decided to add 3D to the film. While this does not entail that it will be bad, it does seem to be a bad sign (think about the Clash of the Titans remake…)

In any case, I do not see a compelling reason to make the Avatar movie. As noted above, the series ran through its story and came to an end. The movie looks like it is simply retelling the same story-a story that has already been told very well. Making it into a live action film also does not seem very compelling either. However, I intend to withhold my final judgment until the film is actually released. Perhaps it will be awesome.

Enhanced by Zemanta
About these ads

One Response

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Asur said, on June 18, 2010 at 10:48 am

    I agree that Avatar has, approximately, no chance of adding to the existing body of story and character development housed in the animated version.

    Likely, as you say, it won’t even serve as a meaningful distillation of the series.

    This pretty much leaves it as a financial move…but, and this is an important ‘but’ to me, it’s also for the fans.

    It’s perhaps not done quite so much in the West, but it’s a staple of the overseas anime industry to release OVA’s and movies to a popular series after it ends. While, similarly, these are designed as money sponges of sorts, they’re welcomed by those who loved the original series and want to spend a little more time in its world.

    I can’t really find fault in this, especially since I don’t see the creation of Art — although it sometimes happens, regardless — as a criteria for the entertainment industry to follow.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,915 other followers

%d bloggers like this: