A Philosopher's Blog

Viagra For Women

Posted in Medicine/Health, Philosophy by Michael LaBossiere on May 25, 2010
Symbol of the planet and Roman goddess Venus, ...

Image via Wikipedia

Well, not quite. However, a drug that is supposed to boost a woman’s libido is being considered for approval by the FDA. This drug, flibanserin, is supposed to have three positive effects: 1) increase in sexual desire, 2) greater sexual satisfaction, and 3) a reduction in emotional distress. Roughly put, it promises better sex through chemistry.

Since men who suffer from erectile dysfunction have various erection corrections to chose from, it seems only fair that women have a similar opportunity to rectify their sexual problems. Given the delay in the development of comparable drugs for women, it might be suspected that old attitudes about female sexuality were a factor. After all, the old stereotypes are that while men are always interested in sex, it is natural for women to lack sexual desire and to merely endure sex without experiencing pleasure. As such, one might claim, a lack of sexual desire and pleasure are not conditions that need correction but merely the natural state for women. Of course, research seems to show that this is not the case and thus the drug would seem to be addressing real problems.

Rather than get into a debate about the true nature of female sexuality, I will instead address the matter of medication. If the drug is addressing a medical problem, then it seems reasonable for women who have that problem to use the drug. This would be analogous to the situation of men who medically need Viagra and to the situation of people who need blood pressure medication.

However, the drug might also be used in cases in which the conditions it is supposed to address are caused by factors that the drug itself does not correct. For example, if a woman is not experiencing desire because of stress or a poor relationship, the drug will merely cover up those problems with a chemically created pseudo-desire. As another example, if a woman is not enjoying sex because she and her partner are not doing a very good job, then the drug will merely cover up that problem as well. As a final example, if a woman is feeling distressed because of real problems, then the drug will merely mask the feelings without doing anything to solve the problems.

It might be replied that even in such cases the drug would be a real improvement because it would enhance the woman’s quality of life: she would feel more desire, more pleasure and less distress. Surely, one might argue, that would justify using the medicine?

That is, of course, a reasonable point. After all, when I take aspirin because of a running injury, it does not help heal the injury. It merely reduces the pain. But, of course, taking the aspirin is fine. That is, provided that masking the pain does not interfere with addressing the underlying cause of the pain.  If it does, then the aspirin will actually contribute to making things worse. An even better analogy might be alcohol: it is said that alcohol can help with sexual desire-but that is hardly a desirable solution.

Likewise for the drug-if a woman medicates herself and does not address the underlying problems, then these problems will remain unresolved. They would either tend to remain the same or even grow worse, perhaps requiring more or new drugs. As such, it would be more sensible to address the underlying problems rather than masking them.

Another reply might be that this criticism would seem to be yet another example of sexual stereotyping. After all, why single out this drug for criticism?

This is a reasonable concern and would be a serious objection if my view were limited to this drug. However, my view of this drug is based on a general principle about drugs, namely that masking problems using drugs is not a wise approach. This is not to say that I am opposed to drugs. But, I think that we have created an unfortunate approach to medication and health issues that has been partially fueled by the pharmaceutical companies. To be specific, there is a general tendency to over-medicate.

In the case of this specific drug, I have no issue with women who have a legitimate medical need for treatment. However, I think it would be a poor choice to use this drug without first determining the cause of the problems and the possibility of addressing them. While I am no expect on female libido, I suspect that in many cases the cause is not a medical disorder but a life problem (the relationship, work, stress, and so on). While a drug might address the effects of life problems, it would not address the causes.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
About these ads

13 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. freddiek said, on May 25, 2010 at 7:57 am

    a possible date-rape drug?

  2. T. J. Babson said, on May 25, 2010 at 8:55 am

    This drug could put a lot of marriage counselors out of business…

  3. magus71 said, on May 26, 2010 at 1:23 am

    I think there should be studies done as to what the problem with modern women’s sex drive is.

    I read that women in the 1950s had more sex than current day women do.

    Perhaps it’s because shopping–so easy now– is for women what sex is for men.

    Here’s sex symbol Kim Kardashian giving what seems to be most women’s views on the matter:

    http://www.limelife.com/blog-entry/Kim-Kardashian-Would-Give-Up-Sex-To-Be-A-Nun/42124.html

    “Kim claims the demands of being a nun wouldn’t be enough to kill her — where men are concerned. “I could cope with being celibate,” Kardashian says. Okay, if there’s one brunette in Hollywood we couldn’t see coping with celibacy, it would be Kim Kardashian. If you say so, Kim. But, here’s what would be tough for Kim to give up: shopping. “Not spending money would be hard,” she says”

    • Michael LaBossiere said, on May 26, 2010 at 4:50 pm

      Is she an adequate sample for most women?

    • freddiek said, on May 26, 2010 at 4:51 pm

      Did women in the fifties have better sex? Or just “more” sex because there were fewer women in the work force so the women had more time to have sex? And of course larger families were still a goal back then. The attempt to reach that goal might have increased the ‘f’ frequency.

      • magus71 said, on May 27, 2010 at 2:15 am

        If the sex was so great for women now, you’d think they’d want to do it more than shop….

        • freddiek said, on May 27, 2010 at 7:41 am

          And men would want to do it more than drink beer, watch football, hunt or fish. . .

          For the record: I think that for men good sex is more attractive than all of the above and that a good woman really does prefer good sex to shopping.

        • Michael LaBossiere said, on May 27, 2010 at 12:35 pm

          Maybe. But women can shop all day and not get pregnant.

          • freddiek said, on May 27, 2010 at 8:16 pm

            ??? In our society a woman can screw all day and not get pregnant.

  4. [...] #split {}#single {}#splitalign {margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;}#singlealign {margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;}.linkboxtext {line-height: 1.4em;}.linkboxcontainer {padding: 7px 7px 7px 7px;background-color:#eeeeee;border-color:#000000;border-width:0px; border-style:solid;}.linkboxdisplay {padding: 7px 7px 7px 7px;}.linkboxdisplay td {text-align: center;}.linkboxdisplay a:link {text-decoration: none;}.linkboxdisplay a:hover {text-decoration: underline;} function opensplitdropdown() { document.getElementById('splittablelinks').style.display = ''; document.getElementById('splitmouse').style.display = 'none'; var titleincell = document.getElementById('titleincell').value; if (titleincell == 'yes') {document.getElementById('splittitletext').style.display = 'none';} } function closesplitdropdown() { document.getElementById('splittablelinks').style.display = 'none'; document.getElementById('splitmouse').style.display = ''; var titleincell = document.getElementById('titleincell').value; if (titleincell == 'yes') {document.getElementById('splittitletext').style.display = '';} } Latest female labedo news – Female Low Libido – Improve Sexual Desire and Get Better HealthSupplements LibidoLatest female labedo news – E3 » Blog Archive » Extenze For women Will Increase Your LibidoHysteriaPeptic Ulcer – Ayurvedic Herbal TreatmentViagra For Women [...]


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 2,018 other followers

%d bloggers like this: